Do worker bees need Copilots?
Today: Microsoft rolled out its second wave of Copilot feature upgrades ahead of a pivotal year for its AI strategy, AWS throws Intel a lifeline, and the latest funding rounds in enterprise tech.
Today: Snowflake targets another layer of the data stack after embracing open formats, why hackers targeted Snowflake customers and stole a massive amount of data, and the latest funding in enterprise tech.
Welcome to Runtime! Today: Snowflake targets another layer of the data stack after embracing open formats, why hackers targeted Snowflake customers and stole a massive amount of data, and the latest funding in enterprise tech.
(Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get Runtime each week.)
SAN FRANCISCO — Snowflake grew into a $45 billion company on the strength of its very sticky data analytics engine, which companies poured their data into over the last decade to improve their decision-making processes. However, as the value of that data skyrocketed, its customers started to realize they wanted more control over how it was used and where it was stored.
At its Data Cloud Summit this week, Snowflake unveiled a new open-source project called Polaris that will help users work with Apache Iceberg, one of several open table formats that have upended the data storage and analytics markets by giving end users the ability to store their data in the repository of their choice. It also extended its support for Iceberg, Snowflake's preferred open format for this new era of data management.
Snowflake also now fully supports Iceberg by allowing Snowflake customers to store Iceberg data in AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, Kleinerman announced in a keynote Tuesday.
However, in an announcement timed to hit precisely when Snowflake executives kicked off Tuesday morning's keynote, rival Databricks announced that it was also planning to double down on Iceberg.
Databricks was ahead of the open format trend with an architecture that never required data storage to sit alongside data compute, but Snowflake's decision to open up its platform means that competition is shifting back to the query engines themselves as AI puts new demands on enterprise data managers.
Over the weekend before Snowflake's event, reports emerged of massive data breaches at Snowflake customers Ticketmaster and Santander. Snowflake confirmed that an incident took place, but insisted that the breach did not stem from any vulnerabilities in its data-warehousing software, which contains an enormous amount of confidential customer information.
According to Ars Technica, the attackers used infostealer malware to obtain legitimate login credentials for several Snowflake customers. Those accounts were not protected by multifactor authentication, which allowed the attackers to make off with the personal information, including some credit card data, of up to millions of customers who paid Ticketmaster exorbitant transaction fees for the privilege.
It's a little hard to understand how anyone responsible for managing a corporate database account containing a treasure trove of sensitive information in 2024 has not activated multifactor authentication on that account. But security researcher Kevin Beaumont criticized Snowflake's MFA implementation and suggested it could have done more to protect its customers.
Firefly raised $23 million in Series A funding to help companies apply security and governance to their code-managed infrastructure.
Stacklet raised $14.5 million in Series B funding for similar technology that helps customers detect and eliminate wasteful cloud spending.
The FTC is asking Microsoft competitors for dirt on its bundling strategy as part of a potential antitrust investigation, according to NextGov/FCW.
CoreWeave offered $1 billion to acquire Core Scientific, a bitcoin mining company that could follow CoreWeave's path and become a GPU provider to AI companies, according to Bloomberg.
Sales of AI servers doubled during the last quarter at HPE, which handily beat Wall Street expectations and raised its guidance for the year.
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger had the chutzpah to complain that U.S. government regulations on chip sales to China were hurting its business, months after receiving $8.5 billion in subsidies from the U.S. government to invest in domestic manufacturing capabilities as a hedge against the security threats posed by, well, China.
Thanks for reading — see you Thursday!