Do worker bees need Copilots?
Today: Microsoft rolled out its second wave of Copilot feature upgrades ahead of a pivotal year for its AI strategy, AWS throws Intel a lifeline, and the latest funding rounds in enterprise tech.
Today: how one CockroachDB user plans to keep going rather than go along with a licensing change, why building new data centers is getting tricky, and the latest funding rounds in enterprise tech.
Welcome to Runtime! Today: how one CockroachDB user plans to keep going rather than go along with a licensing change, why building new data centers is getting tricky, and the latest funding rounds in enterprise tech.
(Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to get Runtime each week.)
At this point, enterprises that built tech stacks around open-source software over the last decade are used to dealing with a steady parade of changes that restrict how that software can be used. But after Cockroach Labs announced earlier this month that CockroachDB would ditch one of those less-than-open licenses, Oxide Computer Company decided to take a unique approach.
Oxide plans to maintain older versions of CockroachDB that remain available under an open-source license rather than switch databases or sign up for Cockroach's new enterprise service, it announced last week. This plan will require the company to deal with any support issues themselves, including writing patches to fix the inevitable problems that pop up when using software over time, and it will prevent Oxide from using new features as they are developed and released by Cockroach Labs.
But the BSL didn't address the real business problem for Cockroach, said co-founder and CEO Spencer Kimball in an interview. As the product matured and became more stable, lots of users — including Oxide — found they actually didn't need the premium enterprise features.
Oxide's approach to Cockroach Labs' licensing change is certainly unique, and it's unlikely that other enterprise users of the open-source project will be able to maintain their own forks or use Oxide's implementation, said Stephen O'Grady, co-founder of analyst firm Redmonk.
Read the rest of the full story on Runtime here.
Sourcing enough energy to run a modern hyperscale data center has always been a primary concern for Big Tech, but the AI boom is putting that requirement at the top of the list. Three developments around the world this week show how data-center operators are going to have to get clever if they want to actually build the capacity they say they need for AI workloads.
In Ireland, Google Cloud was flat-out denied a permit to build a new data center near Dublin after it failed to explain "how the proposal will impact the power supply once operational," according to Bloomberg. On the other side of the world, Microsoft struck a deal to buy power from solar panels installed on government buildings in Singapore, snapping up the majority of the 300 megawatts of power Singapore has set aside for data-center construction.
And closer to home, Meta announced that it will partner with a startup using fracking techniques to tap into geothermal energy sources. Unless the fusion researchers come up with something quick, the hyperscalers are going to be fighting each other for energy for the rest of the decade.
Cribl raised $319 million in Series E funding, valuing the data-management company at $3.5 billion.
Grafana Labs landed $270 million in new funding that values the observability vendor at $6 billion.
Cursor scored $60 million in Series A funding for its AI coding tool, which takes direct aim at the most successful generative AI product to date, GitHub's Copilot.
Opkey raised $47 million in Series B funding to build out its software testing platform, which helps ensure the different components of an ERP system play together nicely.
nOps found $30 million in Series A funding as it develops a cost-optimization tool catering exclusively to AWS customers.
Depot raised $4.1 million in seed funding to speed up the process of software container-image builds.
Cisco acquired Robust Intelligence, an AI software security company, for an undisclosed amount.
Box matched and exceeded Wall Street expectations for revenue and profit, respectively, and raised its guidance for the year, although quarterly revenue grew at just 3% compared to last year.
Thanks for reading — see you Tuesday!